<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Uncarved &#187; rumor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uncarved.prometheas.com/tag/rumor/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uncarved.prometheas.com</link>
	<description>An ongoing tension of potential, or how i learned to stop worrying and embrace the iterations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 05:14:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rumored Apple Tablet Video</title>
		<link>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/08/rumored-apple-tablet-video.html</link>
		<comments>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/08/rumored-apple-tablet-video.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Check it out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncarved.prometheas.com/?p=451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take this sucker with huge grains of salt. Not sure how I&#8217;d feel about each app having its own keyboard, but who&#8217;s to say which details would make it into the shipping version, and which not?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take this sucker with <em>huge</em> grains of salt.</p>

<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/aUOwowuibrk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/aUOwowuibrk&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;color1=0x5d1719&#038;color2=0xcd311b" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>

<p>Not sure how I&#8217;d feel about each app having its own keyboard, but who&#8217;s to say which details would make it into the shipping version, and which not?</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/08/rumored-apple-tablet-video.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Pre-Fucking Themselves?</title>
		<link>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/04/palm-pre-fucking-themselves.html</link>
		<comments>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/04/palm-pre-fucking-themselves.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Really?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncarved.prometheas.com/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechCrunch is reporting that Palm is already creating a second WebOS device, code named Pixie, that will be a &#8220;low end&#8221; version of its upcoming (and as-yet unreleased) Pre. From the post: The Pixie will use the same WebOS operating system and software as the Palm Pre, but in a smaller candy-bar form factor and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch is <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/30/more-info-on-the-second-palm-mini-pre-code-name-pixie/">reporting</a> that Palm is already creating a second WebOS device, code named Pixie, that will be a &#8220;low end&#8221; version of its upcoming (and as-yet unreleased) Pre.</p>

<p>From the post:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>The Pixie will use the same WebOS operating system and software as the Palm Pre, but in a smaller candy-bar form factor and a target $99 price point, say our sources. It will be released only a few months after the Pre in June, so this isn’t an upgrade device. It’s targeted at the lower end of the market.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but this is all sorts of stupid.</p>

<p>For one, prove the concept first. Get the software out there, see what the initial responses are, and refine a bit. See if it sells. See what is and isn&#8217;t not working just right; it&#8217;s entirely possible a fundamental design decision of the hardware somehow needs to be reconsidered based in this information. <em>Then</em> — with some market reaction data in hand — think about a different flavor of hardware that could at least have the benefit of being informed by response to the initial model.</p>

<p>Secondly, they&#8217;re launching a new platform which will have to court developers into its fold with <em>two different</em> screen sizes. Developers interested in targeting both will therefore have a two-device testing matrix out of the gates. Some will go for the full-size features of the Pre, and others will target the Pixie.</p>

<p>Finally, but most importantly, they&#8217;re going to fracture consumer interest. Bringing two similar products to market like this will force prospective consumers to ask themselves which one they want, and whether they &#8220;really need&#8221; whatever&#8217;s in the &#8220;big&#8221; one. In these times, more consumers are likely to steer in an economical direction, given what may well be a relatively equal set of choices, and since Palm would presumably use lower-powered hardware for the Pixie, the general consumer experience will likely feel more constrained.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m scared to death that Palm is killing the most promising new smartphone announced in a little over two years, before the poor thing has even come into the market.</p>

<p>There seems to be some question as to whether the project is completely green-lit, as Arrington mentions:</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>One source says it’s full steam ahead. Another says Palm is waiting to see how the Pre does before announcing the Pixie.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>But, frankly, letting the information leak out like this (and at least having someone think this effort is &#8220;full steam ahead&#8221;) is enough to every bit as much harm as the actual release of the product; the anticipators will begin to demand its release, and start to play a wait-and-see, betting that Palm eventually <em>will</em> drop the Pixie.</p>

<p>And the pundits will buzz about it, and Palm will see weak sales on its Pre, and cave into the expectation of the Pixie&#8217;s release.</p>

<p>As I&#8217;d previously said: as die-hard an iPhone fan as I indeed am, I have been <a href="http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/04/synergy-pres-ace-in-the-hole.html" title="Synergy: Pre&#8217;s Ace in the Hole">keenly looking forward to the Pre</a>, both as a product of wonder and accomplishment, <em>and</em> as some great and much-needed competition for the iPhone, which will only make my favorite phone better, in the long-run.</p>

<p>Palm: good luck.</p>

<p class="update"><span class="date">30 Apr @ 14:34</span>: Let me add that this, of course, is merely rumor at this time; Palm has not officially announced anything. That said, TechCrunch has <a href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/04/30/palm-eos-is-this-the-mini-pre/">another post</a> claiming to have dug up even more details. I would note that the claimed &#8220;shaky&#8221; photo of the Pixie in my original link above differs significantly in proportion from what is shown on the photo in this latest post.</p>
<!-- PHP 5.x -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://uncarved.prometheas.com/2009/04/palm-pre-fucking-themselves.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

